
Inauguration day was an amazing, albeit an amazingly confusing, experience. We watched the inauguration from the National Mall on the same plot as the Washington Monument, via jumbo-tron, 1.4 miles away from history. In fact, this distance remained pretty constant; I never saw the Obamas in the flesh once during my entire trip. But I quickly came to the realization that the distance from the President didn't really matter. People are more likely to trust something they see on tv than with their own eyes anyway. Video can be rewound and revisited. Just like a referee can be overturned by instant replay, the camera shapes people's perception of fact and validates their memories of history. People's lack of proof is what makes them question their lives when told to others. Did I really see Bjork in New York City 4 years ago, or was it just an asian in a gigantic blue bubble jacket wearing a ponytail on the left side of her head?
The point is, the history that was happening on screen, on camera, and perhaps through the eyes of ticket holders in vantage, is fact that cannot be altered. This perspective can be corroborated by many and replayed as proof, but the camera is actually a disconnect from the experience. People at home witnessed an event, while the people on the mall actually experienced it. Even though I was over a mile away from the Inauguration, I never once felt distanced from it.

